Updated SBX Schedule Coming Soon.
Documents
Read about project alternatives, environmental studies and frequently asked questions.
SPAGHETTI BOWL PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS): The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (United States Code [U.S.C.] Title 42 Section 4332) requires that all federal agencies prepare a detailed environmental impact statement (EIS) for major federal actions that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is therefore required to prepare an EIS for proposals funded under its authority if such proposals are determined to be major actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
Record of Decision 
FEIS Cover, Signature and Abstract Page, NEPA Statement
FEIS Executive Summary
FEIS Front Matter
1. FEIS Chapter 1 Project Need
2. Range of Alternatives Considered and Identification of the Preferred Alternative
3. Existing Conditions, Impact, and Mitigation Measures
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Community Resources
3.3 Environmental Justice
3.4 Traffic Noise
3.5 Air Quality
3.6 Transportation Services
3.7 Visual Character
3.8 Water Resources
3.9 Vegetation, Wildlife, and Fish
3.10 Hazardous Materials
3.11 Cultural Resources
3.12 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts
3.13 Relationship of Local and Short-Term Uses Versus Long-Term Productivity
3.14 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
4. Public and Agency Involvement Summary and List of Recipients to Whom Notice of the Environmental Impact Statement Availability was Sent
5. List of Preparers
6. FEIS Chapter 6 Section 4f Evaluation
Index
Appendices
A. Existing Freeway Conditions Report
B. Development of the Freeway Reconstruction Alternatives
B.1 Initial Concepts Report
B.2 Alternatives Design Report
B.2 Design Report Part 1
B.2 Design Report Part 2
B.2 Design Report Part 3
B.2 Design Report Part 4
B.2 Design Report Part5
B.2 Design Report Part 6
B.2 Design Report Part 7
B.2 Design Report Part 8
B.2 Design Report Part 9
B.2 Design Report Part 10
B.2 Design Report Part 11
B.2 Design Report Part 12
B.2 Design Report Part 13
C. Traffic Analysis
D. Resource Impact Reports
D.1 Impact Assessment Methodology
D.2 Community Impacts Assessment
D.3 Relocation Impact Analysis
D.3 Relocation Impact Analysis Part 1
D.3 Relocation Impact Analysis Part 2
D.4 Environmental Justice
D.5A Preferred Alternative (Alternative 2) Highway Traffic Noise Report
D.5B Highway traffic Noise Report
D.6 Air Quality
D.7 Visual Effects
D.8 Aquatic Resource Inventory
D.9 Drainage Design Report
D.10 Biological Opinion
D.11 Vegetation, Wildlife, and Fish
D.12 Hazardous Material: D.12 A, Hazardous Materials Assessment Technical Memorandum; D.12 B, Naturally Occurring Asbestos and Erionite Technical Memorandum
D.13 Cultural Resources Assessment of Effects Report Part 1
D.13 Cultural Resources Assessment of Effects Report Part 2
D.14 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
E Community Involvement and Agency coordination Prior to Draft EIS Approval
F Section 4(f) Evaluation Supporting Information
F Section 4(f) Evaluation Supporting Information Part 1
F Section 4(f) Evaluation Supporting Information Part 2
F Section 4(f) Evaluation Supporting Information F3 F4 F5
G Responses to Draft EIS Comments Part 1
G Responses to Draft EIS Comments Part 2
G Responses to Draft EIS Comments Part 3
H Change in Control of Access Report Part 1
H Change in Control of Access Report Part 2
H Change in Control of Access Report Part 3
SPAGHETTI BOWL PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS): The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (United States Code [U.S.C.] Title 42 Section 4332) requires that all federal agencies prepare a detailed environmental impact statement (EIS) for major federal actions that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is therefore required to prepare an EIS for proposals funded under its authority if such proposals are determined to be major actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
Cover, Signature and Abstract Page, NEPA statement
Executive Summary
Table of Contents, Acronyms
1. Why is the Project Needed?
2. Range of Alternatives/Preferred Alternative
3. Introduction
3.2 Community Resources
3.3 Environmental Justice
3.4 Traffic Noise
3.5 Air Quality
3.6 Transportation Services
3.7 Visual Character
3.8 Water Resources
3.9 Vegetation, Wildlife, and Fish
3.10 Hazardous Material
3.11 Cultural Resources
3.12 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts
3.13 Relationship of Local and Short-Term Uses Versus Long-Term Productivity
3.14 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
4. List of Agencies to Whom Notice of the Environmental Impact Statement Availability was Sent
5. List of Preparers
Index
Appendices
A Existing Freeway Conditions Report
B Development of the Freeway Reconstruction Alternatives
B.1 Initial Concepts Report
B.2 Alternatives Design Report
C Traffic Analysis
D Resource Impacts Report
D.1 Impact Assessment Methodology
D.2 Community Impacts Assessment
D.3 Relocation Impact Analysis
D.4 Environmental Justice
D.5 Highway Traffic Noise
D.6 Air Quality
D.7 Visual Effects
D.8 Aquatic Resource Inventory
D.9 Drainage Design Report
D.10 Biological Assessment
D.11 Vegetation, Wildlife, and Fish
D.12 Hazardous Material: D.12 A, Hazardous Materials Assessment Technical Memorandum; D.12 B, Naturally Occurring Asbestos and Erionite Technical Memorandum
D.13 Draft Cultural Resources Assessment of Effects Report, Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
D.14 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
E Community Involvement and Agency Coordination
F Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation and Section 6(f) Assessment, Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
